Left-Legalism and the Antinomies of Resistance: From the Jewish Question to the Mueller Report with Peter Bratsis

In fall 2019, we exam­ined the begin­ning of the Pre­so­crat­ic tra­di­tion up to Her­a­cli­tus and Par­menides. Start­ing from Par­menides again and end­ing with the Atom­ists, our con­cep­tu­al focus will once again be on the ontol­ogy of indi­vid­u­a­tion, sin­gu­lar­i­ty, and unrest. We will again con­sid­er the first ques­tion asked by the Pre­so­crat­ics, What is it? We will go back to Par­menides’ cen­tral ques­tion, Is it or is it not? We will prob­lema­tize his dis­cov­ery of what-is and the exclu­sion of what-is-not. Most impor­tant­ly, we will appre­ci­ate the idea that what-is is essen­tial­ly what-can-be, name­ly, real­i­ty is poten­tial­i­ty: with Par­menides, just like with Her­a­cli­tus, a sub­ter­ranean and nev­er-end­ing fire, or unrest.

A four week course with Bruno Gul­li begin­ning Tues­day, Jan­u­ary 21st, 2020 at 6:30 – $15 per class or $50 for all four ses­sions

Much has been said about “dialec­tics” in the con­text of left­ist think­ing about pol­i­tics, yet often the con­ver­sa­tion is often vague on the specifics of what is it that dialec­tics in think­ing actu­al­ly means? What is gained by deploy­ing “dialec­ti­cal thought”? To counter this ten­den­cy, we will trace spe­cif­ic artic­u­la­tions of dialec­ti­cal move­ment in thought, with the aim of gain­ing a clear­er under­stand­ing of the fun­da­men­tal con­cepts, ideas and meth­ods that relate to this mode of think­ing.

Our focus is on build­ing a ground­ing in think­ing about every­day life that seeks (rather than avoids) con­tra­dic­tions, and is capa­ble of sur­viv­ing (as Hegel said) the ten­sions that arise with­in it.

Read­ings will begin with a dis­cus­sion of sec­tions from Hegel’s stud­ies of log­ic and specif­i­cal­ly, his devel­op­ment of the syl­lo­gism. We will then pro­ceed to a dis­cus­sion of Hegel’s log­ic and its trans­for­ma­tion by Marx in Vol­ume 2 of “Cap­i­tal”, via a close read­ing of David L. Harvey’s sem­i­nal essay “The Log­ic of Com­mod­i­ty Cir­cuits”. Through­out the course, we will also inte­grate Sovi­et philoso­pher Evald Ilyenkov’s fun­da­men­tal inves­ti­ga­tions of dialec­ti­cal log­ic. The goal is to unlock a sen­si­tiv­i­ty towards dialec­ti­cal thought, as well as approach­es to writ­ing and think­ing sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly in this tra­di­tion.

This six week lec­ture and inter­ac­tive sem­i­nar will engage in a read­ing of the sec­tions in Hegel’s Phe­nom­e­nol­o­gy of Spir­it on Rea­son, Spir­it and Reli­gion in the light of con­tem­po­rary strug­gles as the world his­tor­i­cal spir­it unfolds. In par­tic­u­lar, we will try to trace the “cun­ning of Rea­son” from the age of Rev­o­lu­tion to the reac­tionary spir­it of the mid­dle 19th cen­tu­ry through the ten­den­cies of State rea­son to the rea­son and rights to rebel­lion. Poet­ic chal­lenges to the Hegelian sys­tem by Rim­baud and Mal­larme as well as the mate­ri­al­ist inver­sion and over­turn­ing of the “ide­al­ist” sys­tem by Marx and Engels. The ques­tion of Sub­jec­tiv­i­ty and dialec­ti­cal rea­son will con­sis­tent­ly be empha­sized in the course and in this con­text a very care­ful read­ing of the “Eth­i­cal Order” wiil be encoun­tered with the nec­es­sary cor­re­la­tions to Antigone.

In fall 2019, we exam­ined the begin­ning of the Pre­so­crat­ic tra­di­tion up to Her­a­cli­tus and Par­menides. Start­ing from Par­menides again and end­ing with the Atom­ists, our con­cep­tu­al focus will once again be on the ontol­ogy of indi­vid­u­a­tion, sin­gu­lar­i­ty, and unrest. We will again con­sid­er the first ques­tion asked by the Pre­so­crat­ics, What is it? We will go back to Par­menides’ cen­tral ques­tion, Is it or is it not? We will prob­lema­tize his dis­cov­ery of what-is and the exclu­sion of what-is-not. Most impor­tant­ly, we will appre­ci­ate the idea that what-is is essen­tial­ly what-can-be, name­ly, real­i­ty is poten­tial­i­ty: with Par­menides, just like with Her­a­cli­tus, a sub­ter­ranean and nev­er-end­ing fire, or unrest.

A four week course with Bruno Gul­li begin­ning Tues­day, Jan­u­ary 21st, 2020 at 6:30 – $15 per class or $50 for all four ses­sions

Much has been said about “dialec­tics” in the con­text of left­ist think­ing about pol­i­tics, yet often the con­ver­sa­tion is often vague on the specifics of what is it that dialec­tics in think­ing actu­al­ly means? What is gained by deploy­ing “dialec­ti­cal thought”? To counter this ten­den­cy, we will trace spe­cif­ic artic­u­la­tions of dialec­ti­cal move­ment in thought, with the aim of gain­ing a clear­er under­stand­ing of the fun­da­men­tal con­cepts, ideas and meth­ods that relate to this mode of think­ing.

Our focus is on build­ing a ground­ing in think­ing about every­day life that seeks (rather than avoids) con­tra­dic­tions, and is capa­ble of sur­viv­ing (as Hegel said) the ten­sions that arise with­in it.

Read­ings will begin with a dis­cus­sion of sec­tions from Hegel’s stud­ies of log­ic and specif­i­cal­ly, his devel­op­ment of the syl­lo­gism. We will then pro­ceed to a dis­cus­sion of Hegel’s log­ic and its trans­for­ma­tion by Marx in Vol­ume 2 of “Cap­i­tal”, via a close read­ing of David L. Harvey’s sem­i­nal essay “The Log­ic of Com­mod­i­ty Cir­cuits”. Through­out the course, we will also inte­grate Sovi­et philoso­pher Evald Ilyenkov’s fun­da­men­tal inves­ti­ga­tions of dialec­ti­cal log­ic. The goal is to unlock a sen­si­tiv­i­ty towards dialec­ti­cal thought, as well as approach­es to writ­ing and think­ing sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly in this tra­di­tion.